Добро пожаловать в клуб

Показать / Спрятать  Домой  Новости Статьи Файлы Форум Web ссылки F.A.Q. Логобург    Показать / Спрятать

       
Поиск   
Главное меню
ДомойНовостиСтатьиПостановка звуковФайлыДефектологияКнижный мирФорумСловарьРассылкаКаталог ссылокРейтинг пользователейЧаВо(FAQ)КонкурсWeb магазинШкольникамКарта сайта

Поздравляем!
Поздравляем нового Логобуржца tatbocman со вступлением в клуб!

Реклама

КНИЖНЫЙ МИР

Toxicity Versus Proximity   Vaneet Dhir and Pooja Dhand

Toxicity Versus Proximity

64 страниц. 2011 год.
LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
This approach was made by Dhir et al. based on X-ray Crystallography in terms of Toxicity versus Proximity on the basis of Ligand preparation and characterization by Nuclear Magnetic Spectroscopy, Infra red spectroscopy, Magnetic Susceptibility & CHN(Mass Analyzer) Techniques. DETP & DPTP have been found to be similar potential toxic as they have been used in fungicides and other antibacterial products. Approach has been made on the basis of Biomimetics. The study reveals that Cu complexes are much more potentially toxic than lead compounds because in lead compounds ligands may occupy all the centres or corners of the Pb(I/II)metal ions and very less void is left to interact physiochemically with various proteins/ amino acids or DNA of living cell to disrupt their cycle to become potential toxic and carcinogenic in nature. Thus Pb(I/II)metal ions are very toxic with less hydrophobic group while Cu(II) complexes are very toxic with big/steric ligands as compared to small one. This fact...
 
- Генерация страницы: 0.04 секунд -